Welcome to the DFO World Wiki. With many major updates since the release of DFO, many items are missing. Visit Item Database Project to learn more.
Please remember to click "show preview" before saving the page.
Thanks for the updated logo snafuPop!
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lightsabre Mastery"
m (moved Talk:Beam Sword Mastery to Talk:Lightsabre Mastery: In-game name to match article) |
(→Quite a few have this passive) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is the actual skill called Beam Sword Mastery in game? Weapons in game that give + skill to it calls it Lightsabre mastery instead. - [[User:HellMuT|HellMuT]] 01:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | Is the actual skill called Beam Sword Mastery in game? Weapons in game that give + skill to it calls it Lightsabre mastery instead. - [[User:HellMuT|HellMuT]] 01:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == I don't think it'd be an issue since the still versions are covered, that and they'll get neatened up once the beta comes out. == | ||
| + | |||
| + | But it's a good question on if one should make separate versions of such common things or just merge them all under one skill. I think it'd be better to leave Dark Knight and Slayer's masteries be in the same thing as the former is based on the latter.--[[User:Fishman46|Fishman46]] ([[User talk:Fishman46|talk]]) 00:07, 6 March 2015 (PST) | ||
| + | :HellMuT has been inactive for sometime. I'm not sure if he will be back. I personally think that we should combine skills, and post comparisons on it. --[[User:Dfoplayer|Dfoplayer]] ([[User talk:Dfoplayer|talk]]) 07:17, 6 March 2015 (PST) | ||
| + | :: I think it's that way for the gunner's skills though not the fighters atm. I wonder about Sword Master's masteries as they seem to be named a bit different than M.Slayer/Dark Knight's--[[User:Fishman46|Fishman46]] ([[User talk:Fishman46|talk]]) 15:14, 6 March 2015 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Quite a few have this passive == | ||
| + | |||
| + | So should we create individual pages for each class or make creative use of the tabs to keep everything on one page? - [[User:Blakdoxaduo|Blakdoxaduo]] ([[User talk:Blakdoxaduo|talk]]) 06:30, 17 July 2015 (PDT) | ||
| + | :Well there's only two characters with a variation of this: Weapon Master and Dark Knight (his is called Shadowy Lightsaber Mastery); Vagabond doesn't have it at all just the license. | ||
| + | ::Feel free to use tabs, just like the gunners.--[[User:Dfoplayer|Dfoplayer]] ([[User talk:Dfoplayer|talk]]) 16:09, 17 July 2015 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:09, 17 July 2015
Is the actual skill called Beam Sword Mastery in game? Weapons in game that give + skill to it calls it Lightsabre mastery instead. - HellMuT 01:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
I don't think it'd be an issue since the still versions are covered, that and they'll get neatened up once the beta comes out.
But it's a good question on if one should make separate versions of such common things or just merge them all under one skill. I think it'd be better to leave Dark Knight and Slayer's masteries be in the same thing as the former is based on the latter.--Fishman46 (talk) 00:07, 6 March 2015 (PST)
- HellMuT has been inactive for sometime. I'm not sure if he will be back. I personally think that we should combine skills, and post comparisons on it. --Dfoplayer (talk) 07:17, 6 March 2015 (PST)
Quite a few have this passive
So should we create individual pages for each class or make creative use of the tabs to keep everything on one page? - Blakdoxaduo (talk) 06:30, 17 July 2015 (PDT)
